1-week Online LIVE deep-dive workshop led by industry practitioners
2-month program on full stack development
Online LIVE course on how to build your own eCommerce business in 1 week
Capacity building programs for organizations going through their digital transformation journeys.
We power startup programs for corporates and governments
We attract the world's best tech companies to help you solve specific challenges.
Practical Entrepreneurship Programs Designed for Universities
Establish a 100% foreign-owned entity in Saudi Arabia
Passionate about capability building, startups and technology? Join AstroLabs as a full timer, course instructor, expert mentor, and more...
Learn about the AstroLabs methodology, our values and leadership team
Startup, technology and digital jobs in Dubai and across MENA
Our perspective on all things digital and entrepreneurship
“Sales Strategy”, “Sales Force Design”, “Customer Engagement” are some of the concepts that affects hundreds of decisions and end results in the sales organization. This is relatively easy to apply from Top to Bottom, from concept to action. Once the concept is clear, the process can be set, and the decisions can be planned to execute; But what if the problem is only clear in the bottom? What if our concerns are raised in a specific unit of a specific sector of our sales organization? And this usually is the case.
Common questions are frequently raised by business leaders who need the link between that tangible scenario and the conceptual solution:
Q1: Is it a good idea to hire only people with sales experience?
The answer is No. Experience brings you capabilities and competencies that you surely want to look for, such as negotiation, closing, and product/industry knowledge, but if you want to build a long-term goal then you might want to look for crucial characteristics as well.
Motivation, Drive for achievement, good listening, analytical mind, adaptivity, persistence are some of the crucial characteristics that you really need to look for in a sales position candidate to cater for the job success and the sales organization healthy development.
Train Competencies, Hire Characteristics.
Q2. Which selection is more efficient: an excellent sales manager with an average salesperson, or an average manager with an excellent salesperson?
The direct answer would be: excellent salespeople if you are looking for short-term goal achievements; and excellent sales manager if you are looking for long-term goal achievements. A way to reason it is that an average manager tends to surround her/himself with average salespeople, so the new hires would be average, and excellent salespeople would eventually find themselves out. However, a class A manager will look for class A salespeople, and highly develop the average existing team.
The best solution would be excellent manager with excellent people which is very hard to attain, so the second best thing would definitely be an excellent manager for the long-term sales organization optimization.
Q3. Is it effective to promote your best salesperson to be a sales manager?
Promote someone that can do well the next job and not the last job!
Q4. Should we rank our salespeople by performance? But is it best to share it with the entire sales team?
To answer the first question: It is definitely yes; in order to have a visibility of your team levels, development, and progress then set the plans accordingly. However, the second question is a “sword with two edges”. 55% of managers believe that it is healthy to publicly present the entire team ranking order to increase the competitive drive, and set individual motive to progress in the ranking. However, some of the down sides of this action would be:
Q5. If I have a 60/40 plan, what is the amount truly at risk? is it only 60%?
If a sales organization works on a 60% salary and 40% incentive pay, most organization think the 60% is only at risk, however the answer is unfortunately higher than that. There is a hidden salary that most companies miss to calculate which is the carryover. Some salespeople take over older or running accounts, or covered territories and benefit from their incentives with minimal efforts. you might as well call it salary.
So, the amount at risk is actually 60% + hidden pay (incentive earned) which might reach to 83%.
Technology and education both independently have their respective roles and significance, the graph of which is quickly risin...
Digital learning, the emergency of e-learning and the development of microlearning have all helped your employees get the mos...
I remember around 3 or 4 years ago, there was a saying that I used to hear a lot: “Money Talks”. Now I can...